Psychological Doubling Frankenstein free essay sample

This character then is paired with vaguely similar traits, thus making the two appear as twins but one is the guarded twin and the other being the twin that lives out all the hidden wants and desires. This clever literary device helps further character development while also bringing out the evil behind a seemingly innocent character in a novel. According to Sigmund Freud the manifestation that is made up of a characters hidden desires and wants is called the shadow self. He also believes that between the twins like characters there is always one evil twin. Freud says that the evil twin is most often followed by some kind disease or sickness as a symbol of corruption and plague for hell. In most literature the doppelganger is the evil twin because most hidden desires are against what society finds acceptable or normal. However, in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, that is not the case. We will write a custom essay sample on Psychological Doubling Frankenstein or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Shelley uses that literary stereotype to present the characters as an evil character and a good character on the surface. But by the end of the Shelley reveals that the characters’ stereotype roles are reversed, making Frankenstein the monster the good character, and Victor the evil scientist. This â€Å"role reversal† technique also helps further develop not just one character, but both characters. Victor in the novel appears as an intelligent, courageous, and driven man. However, by the end of the novel he is revealed as a sick, obsessed, and cowardly man. By completely remolding Victor’s persona as the novel develops, the novel also shows the good inside Frankenstein through contrasting personas, thus, making the monster appear as the abandoned child, the victim, in the novel. At the end of the novel the monster makes himself appear vulnerable when he breaks down into sobs. This new side of him shows that his murderous acts were done out of hurt, a crave for attention from â€Å"daddy† who abandoned him. Ultimately showing us, the character’s manifestation of his hidden wants and desires, despite society’s acceptance, this then shows us the good or the evil intentions of the character’s hidden wants and desires morally rather than basing it on the idea that is it automatically evil because it is not acceptable in society. By doing this, Shelley makes the characters both key characters to the novel and does not let all focus be on just one character. Sigmund Freud broke the human psyche down into three parts, the id, the ego, and the superego. According to Freud, The id is all the biological pieces of a person’s personality including sex, instinct, and aggressive instinct. It is the impulsive and the unconscious part of the psyche. It is not affected by what is realistic but specifically by what we desire. The ego is developed to mediate between the unrealistic desires of the id and the external world. This works by reason while the id is chaotic. It seeks pleasure like the id but finds a way to get it realistically. The superego on the other hand incorporates the values and morals of society. It is to control the id’s impulses, especially those that are not acceptable in society. It is separated into two parts, the conscience and the ideal self. The conscience can punish the ego by feelings of guilt. The ideal self is an imaginary picture of how we think we ought to be, falling short of the ideal self results in the feeling of guilt. The ideal self is determined through parents expectations ultimately. In the novel, Victor’s father disapproves of his choice to pursue a career in science. With his father never approving of him Victor’s ideal self will never be achieved, thus creating a guilty hole in Victor’s emotional psyche. This ultimately can cause a person to bury their hidden desires as Victor seemed to. But of course we cannot forget part of ourselves. Victor’s unconscious mind developed through his own creation, the monster (Frankenstein). A person’s ideal self is not the negative desires it is what you wish to achieve, making Frankenstein a role model to Victor rather than a haunting memory. In the novel we immediately believe that Frankenstein, the monster, is the evil twin because of his twisted and gruesome appearance accompanied with his crazed killing spree, and then added with his harassment on Victor Frankenstein his creator. However, Freud believes that the evil twin is marked by a plague, which most often appears as a disease or sickness. In the novel Victor suffers from a sickness towards the end of the novel and eventually dies from the illness. The author also uses certain descriptive writing that describes him as a sickness to himself. I thought I saw Elizabeth, in the bloom of health, walking in the streets of Ingolstadt. Delighted and surprised, I embraced her; but as I imprinted the first kiss on her lips, they became livid with the hue of death; her features appeared to change, and I thought that I held the corpse of my dead mother in my arms; a shroud enveloped her form, and I saw the grave-worms crawling in the folds of the flannel. † (Shelley, 5 7). Here we are seeing a dream Victor is having, which is exploring hidden unconscious mind, or his id, his desire for Elizabeth is immediately clouded with disease and death. The association with disease and death and sexuality all correlate to what Freud believes marks the evil twin. This quote shows that the doubt and judgment of himself is clouding over what good, being Elizabeth, he has in his life, thus rotting everything about him. Along with this, the author also speaks of Victor in a certain context that brings out his clouded judgment and his evil being. The context in which Victor’s character is developed points at the idea that he is the evil twin. The audience on the surface sees Victor as a poor scientist who had a miserable past full of solitude and rejection. But having such an awful past can corrupt you and drive you sick with your own self torture and judgment. This is what Mary Shelley was trying to hint at when speaking so much of Victor’s past when he discovered his love for science. Victor is constantly fighting an internal battle on whether or not he is a good person and that his intentions to discover how to make life are pure and he is not overstepping the boundary line and is just trying to play the role of God, â€Å"How dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to be greater than his nature will allow. (Shelley, 87). In the novel Shelley also talks a lot about Victor’s poor relationship with his father and portrays how that affected Victor’s psyche through the development of Victor’s thought process in the text, â€Å"I knew well therefore what would be my father’s feelings, but I could not tear my tho ughts from my employment, loathsome in itself, but which it had taken and irresistible hold of my imagination. I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed. † (Shelley, 54). This is during a part after Victor had left home and he was reflecting on his father’s goodbye to him. This quote shows that his father filled Victor with hate and abandonment therefore causing Victor to doubt himself and never feel sure even with his thoughts. As Victor thinks here his thought process goes back and forth as he doubts, even, what are his feelings towards how distant he is from his family. The author also when describing the setting around the two characters, the monster and Victor, creates an eerie tranquility about the monster while around Victor the author puts him amidst utter chaos to show his internal struggle and corruption within himself. For example, the scene when Victor discovers a new theory create life it is through seeing lightning destroy and kill a tree. Another example is when Victor is in the glaciers and there is a giant thunderstorm and the author goes into detail of the flashes of lightning to describe Victor’s inner struggle with himself. Mary Shelley uses the idea of doppelganger to further develop the two characters, Victor and the monster, by reversing the norm of the doppelganger and making it the good twin, the monster, while making the other twin, Victor, the evil twin. This was portrayed in the novel through Sigmund Freud’s theory of the human psyche and his perspective of the doppelganger, the use of disease and death in the novel, and the context in which the author spoke of the two characters and how that portrayed them. By making Victor the evil twin it shows that he felt that he could not adjust to society because of his father’s disapproval and buried his ideal self, thus creating the monster that was formed from Victor’s ideal self thus being a role model for Victor rather than a haunting memory of shameful desires.

5 Signs You May Be the Right Person for the Job

5 Signs You May Be the Right Person for the Job Jobs are anything but one size fits all. In fact, another candidate’s â€Å"perfect† position may be your employment nightmare. So how do you know which job promises success and fulfillment and which job harbors only frustration and failure? The short answer? You don’t. But there are some signs to look for throughout the process which can indicate that you’re indeed the right person for the job. Let’s count them down. 1. You’re Charged Up By the Thought of the JobAre you thrilled by the mere thought of the roles and responsibilities involved with a particular job or specific company? Would you wake up every morning looking forward to getting to work and making a contribution? If so, this is a strong indication that the job may be a terrific fit.If, however, you feel more excited about getting any job than about the specifics of the job at hand, this should trigger an alarm.2. You’ll Be Crushed If You Don’t Get ItNo one likes to be rejected. But if the thought of being rejected from a particular job is especially crushing, this may indicate that the job offers a unique opportunity. After all, there are hundreds of thousands of different jobs available at any given moment. If your heart is set on this one above everything else in the job classifieds section, you’re probably the right person for the job.3. It’s In Line With Your Career GoalsHave you always dreamed of working in a specific industry or of being responsible for a certain set of core job functions? If a job offers the opportunity to realize your goals and ambitions, it’s a natural leap to the conclusion that it’s not only the right job for you, but an unprecedented opportunity.Alternatively, if a job feels like a detour from your career path or a step in an uncertain direction, it merits more consideration: can it ultimately help you reach your career goals?4. You’re a Good Culture FitToday’s employers ar e increasingly prioritizing cultural fit - as opposed to mere functional fit - as an important part of the hiring process. This consideration should go both ways. If your beliefs and core values are aligned with a prospective company’s views on everything from collaboration to work/life balance to giving back to the community, this bodes well for your level of satisfaction, productivity, and staying power.5. There’s Plenty of Room for GrowthA job that’s a good fit for you at this particular moment in time may not be a good fit for you five years from now. The â€Å"right† job is not just one that makes sense in the here and now, but is also one with plenty of room for growth.The potential for advancement can also help keep you motivated, inspired and engaged on the job - critical attributes when it comes to professional fulfillment.Ultimately, it’s impossible to know with absolute certainty whether a job is the right one for you. However, these five tips can help you make the most informed and beneficial decision.

Israeli Prime Ministers Since Establishment of the State in 1948

Israeli Prime Ministers Since Establishment of the State in 1948 Since the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, the prime minister is the head of the Israeli government and the most powerful figure in Israeli politics. Although the president of Israel is the countrys head of state, his powers are largely ceremonial; the prime minister holds most of the real power. The official residence of the prime minister, Beit Rosh Hamemshala, is in Jerusalem. The Knesset is the national legislature of Israel. As the legislative branch of the Israeli government, the Knesset passes all laws, elects the president and prime minister, although the prime minister is ceremonially appointed by the president, approves the cabinet, and supervises the work of the government. Israels Prime Ministers Since 1948 Following an election, the president nominates a member of the Knesset to become prime minister after asking party leaders whom they support for the position. The nominee then presents a government platform and must receive a vote of confidence in order to become prime minister. In practice, the prime minister is usually the leader of the largest party in the governing coalition. Between 1996 and 2001, the prime minister was directly elected, separately from the Knesset. Israeli Prime Minister Years Party David Ben-Gurion 1948-1954 Mapai Moshe Sharett 1954-1955 Mapai David Ben-Gurion 1955-1963 Mapai Levi Eshkol 1963-1969 Mapai/Alignment/Labor Golda Meir 1969-1974 Alignment/Labor Yitzhak Rabin 1974-1977 Alignment/Labor Menachem Begin 1977-1983 Likud Yitzhak Shamir 1983-1984 Likud Shimon Peres 1984-1986 Alignment/Labor Yitzhak Shamir 1986-1992 Likud Yitzhak Rabin 1992-1995 Labor Shimon Peres 1995-1996 Labor Benjamin Netanyahu 1996-1999 Likud Ehud Barak 1999-2001 One Israel/Labor Ariel Sharon 2001-2006 Likud/Kadima Ehud Olmert 2006-2009 Kadima Benjamin Netanyahu 2009-present Likud Order of Succession If the prime minister dies in office, the cabinet chooses an interim prime minister, to run the government until a new government is placed in power. According to Israeli law, if a prime minister is temporarily incapacitated rather than dies, power is transferred to the  acting prime minister, until the prime minister recovers, for up to 100 days. If the prime minister is declared permanently incapacitated, or that period expires, the President of Israel oversees the process of assembling a new governing coalition, and in the meantime, the acting prime minister or other incumbent minister is appointed by the cabinet to serve as an interim prime minister. Parliamentary Parties of the Prime Ministers The Mapai Party was the party of the first prime minister of Israel during the formation of the state. It was considered  the dominant force in Israeli politics until its merger into the modern-day Labor Party in 1968. The party introduced progressive reforms such as the  establishment of a welfare state, providing a minimum income, security, and access to housing subsidies and health and social services. The Alignment was a group of consisting of the Mapai and Ahdut Haavoda-Poalei Zion parties around the time of the sixth Knesset. The group later included the newly formed Israel Labor Party and Mapam. The Independent Liberal Party joined the Alignment around the 11th Knesset. The Labor Party was a parliamentary group formed in the course of the 15th Knesset after Gesher left One Israel and included the Labor Party and Meimad, which was a moderate religious party, that never ran independently in Knesset elections. One Israel, the party of Ehud Barak, was made up of the Labor Party, Gesher and Meimad during the 15th Knesset. The Kadima was established towards the end of the 16th Knesset, a new parliamentary group, Achrayut Leumit, which means National Responsibility, split off from the Likud. Approximately two months later, Acharayut Leumit changed its name to Kadima. The Likud was established in 1973 around the time of the elections for the eighth Knesset. It consisted of the Herut Movement, the Liberal Party, the Free Center, the National List and Greater Israel Activists.

Funding Healthcare Services Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Funding Healthcare Services - Assignment Example It is important to denote that privatized ambulatory company aim at making profits. The insurance cover of the patients under consideration also plays a role in paying the services offered by the ambulatory company/organization (Accountability Office, 2005). The society and other non-profit making organization in the health sector also provide ambulatory services. The government can use the tax payer’s money to sponsor such kind of an organization. This is because they contribute in the provision of medical services, to the public, at a cheaper cost. On this basis, to increase their efficiency, the government needs to fund these organizations. Hospitals are also responsible for the provision of ambulatory services. These services can either be paid by the insurance company, or the patient under consideration, but this mostly occurs if the hospital under consideration is a private hospital (Mossialos, 2002). The ambulatory services provided by government owned hospitals should be funded by the tax payer’s money. This is because people, who access government hospitals, are always poor, and sometimes, they cannot afford to pay for their medical costs. Funding Services in Continuum Long Term Care: For purposes of financing services in long term care, it is important to involve all the stake holders of the health industry within the country. That is during the process of policy formulation. For example, when formulating a policy on how to finance services offered under continuum long term care, it is important to analyze the various costs that hospitals offer in the provision of such kind of services (Accountability Office, 2012). For example, it is very expensive to fund patients suffering from chronic diseases. This is because the disease takes a long period of time to treat, and the medications are very expensive. On this basis, to fund the treatment and care of such kind of diseases, it is necessary to involve the taxpayers, nongovernmental organiz ations, and insurance companies. The government needs to introduce insurance health care programs that can help to reduce the high costs of long term care (Fortinash, 2012). These health insurance programs must be funded by the taxpayers. In other words, the government needs to introduce new taxes that will fund the program under consideration. However, while increasing taxes for purposes of raising money to fund long term care, the government should be careful not to raise taxes on medical equipments, and health products that are used for purposes of providing health services in long term care. In fact, the government should reduce taxes in health care products, as this will most definitely lead to a reduction in the various costs associated with the provision health services to satisfy long term care (Levy, 2012). There is also the need of providing grants to hospitals that offer services in continuum long term care. The government and other non-governmental organizations should i dentify such health care organization, and thereafter fund them through grants. However, these grants should be attached with strict conditions that the hospital under consideration must meet. That is if they wish to continue receiving those grants from the federal government, and non-governmental

Recent changes in local laws in various countries set requirements for Essay

Recent changes in local laws in various countries set requirements for National Oil Companies (NOCs) participation in oil and ga - Essay Example Joint ventures are common among the operators within the oil and gas industry in order to tray and minimize operation risks as well as technical challenges often faced while in the normal operations in the industry. Companies involved in exploration of oil and gas, general exploitation of the same as well as appraisal and production activities are in recent times being not executed by single companies but through collaboration by many companies. These joint ventures therefore share in towards contributing for expenditures and other costs incurred and share the proceeds realized in the exploration and exploitation of the commodity according to individual company’s contributions. Joint ventures operate on the platform of sharing on capital investments as well as skills and expertise, which necessitates one company, which would lack such to benefit from the partner(s) in the venture. Joint ventures within the oil and gas industry enjoy such privileges as being unincorporated and hence they are not taxed and cannot sue or are sued for the reason of not having distinct legal personality. The terms of licensure of operations by joint ventures imposes some liabilities on them as stipulated by the governing authority, which the joint operating agreement purposely addresses. The JOA therefore have particular roles in regulating the obligations, relationships as well as the rights that govern the parties in a joint venture. Normally, the agreement is binding over lifetime or until the joint operations ceases because of completion of a task or otherwise as would be determined in termination of a contract. It stipulates the funding procedures as well as the voting procedures and has other stipulations on mechanisms to address corrective measures instituted in the event that a partner fails to act in accordance to the agreement. Therefore, the general infrastructure of the legal framework guiding the joint operating agreements is binding and well laid out. The partie s therefore undertake a critical outlook into the structure of the JOA regarding any unforeseen eventualities, which would occur in the future. However, it is worth noting that the formulation and adoption of a JOA framework must be based on an existing legal structure such as the English law, which then stipulates the institutional framework that would govern the running of the agreement between the parties engaged in the joint venture (Jensen and Failat, 2013, p. 1-13). National governments as well as foreign companies interact in the industry of oil and gas through consent through negotiated contracts. NOC (National oil companies) normally gets involved in the exploitation of and exploration for oil through signing into contracts such as concession agreements, service contracts, joint venture contracts as well as production sharing agreements, which involves collaborating with other external companies in the oil and gas deals. Nevertheless, the operations of such contracts involv ing the national oil companies as well as other external companies necessitates the operation-ization of a structure that would be instrumental in outlining the operations of the agreement and this is formalized through the JOAs. The evolution of legal structures that govern the

Disneys Effect on Society and Culture Essay -- essays papers

Disneys Effect on Society and Culture For nearly seven decades Corporate Disney has dazzled its audiences; generation after generation have been entertained through avenues ranging from movies to elaborate theme parks. While many find this massive establishment to be a significant part of American culture and welcome the Disney spirit with open arms, one man in particular looks past the hype and into his own theory of the Disney Corporation. Carl Hiaasen, a journalist for the Miami Herald, paints a witty and sarcastic portrait in this nonfiction account of a company. Hiaasen critizises the company for manifesting evil, enveloping perfection to a sickening extent, and who’s sole purpose is to inhale as much money as feasibly possible. The book opens with Times Square-an area home to many things: MTV, Morgan Stanley, the worlds largest Mariot Hotel, the Ford Center for the Performing Arts, and Peep Land, as well as the glittering new Disney Store. Hiaasen provides an interesting perspective, claiming Disney is out to â€Å"vanquish sleaze in its unholiest fountainhead, Times Square.†(2) While to some this intrusion of the new Disney Store is obtrusive, to many it is the beginning of a turn around for this otherwise less than clean, corrupt area within our society called Times Square. Hiaasen continues his bleak opinion of the company by claiming, â€Å"Disney is so good at being good that it manifests an evil†¦...

Benefits of Organic Food Essay

Organic food, once only found in health food stores, is now a consistent element at local supermarkets. So what is the difference between a conventionally grown apple and an organic one? The answer is in the way the crop is grown and what it is and is not exposed to. In order to be labeled â€Å"organic† the farmer who grew it used renewable resources and conservation of soil and water methods. Also, organic farmers do not use conventional pesticides or weed killers, which may contain synthetic ingredients or sewage sludge. According to Fisher, â€Å"Sewage sludge from municipalities’ waste may contain heavy metals and toxins . . . † (1). Rather, organic farmers use sophisticated crop rotations, spread mulch and manure, and even hand pull weeds to keep them away. Instead of applying pesticides, they use beneficial insects and birds or traps to keep pests from harming the crop. The organic apple at the grocery store was never exposed to pesticides, chemicals, additives or preservatives. Pesticides may cause harmful effects to the nervous system and mild skin and eye irritations. Chemicals used in additives and preservatives may disrupt the natural rebuilding of cells and your resistance to disease diminishes after continued exposure to these chemicals according to Lagerquist. According to the USDA, instead of these harmful ingredients, the organic apple has higher levels of minerals, vitamin C and antioxidants. Vitamin C is helpful in protecting your immune system, decreasing cardiovascular disease and promotes healthy skin. Antioxidants protect cells against free radicals that create destructive processes in the cells. Besides being beneficial to your health, organic food has a positive impact on the environment. Farming organic food allows for less groundwater to become contaminated that in the process of farming conventional crops. This is because organic crops are never exposed to harmful chemicals that can seep into the ground and infect our groundwater. This absence of chemicals in the ground water also means that the quality of the soil is greater. When the soil is not exposed to chemicals such as pesticides and insecticides, it is able to be of better quality. With better soil quality, comes stronger crops for years to come. Another benefit to the environment is that organic crops increase biodiversity. Biodiversity is created because the absence of chemical inputs creates a habitat suitable for wildlife. Also, because there is no insecticides used farmers of organic farms are forced to use natural pest control methods. This means that to control one type of pest, the famer has to bring in other pests to kill it, creating a diverse farm. Organic farms also do not use synthetic fertilizers, so one way to keep the soil up is to bring in different types of worms, arthropods, and microbes. These animals stabilize and detoxify soil. Organic farming also helps the environment by using conservation methods. Organic farms are planted where the crops could grow naturally, instead of clearing away land for the purpose of planting there. They also conserve soil by not only planting the crop, but also planting other vegetation where there are places crops are not growing to make sure the topsoil does not get blown away by the elements. Crop rotating is also used. This is when the farmer plants more than one crop in the same place. For example, one year the farmer might plant corn in field, but the next year he plants beans. This process of crop rotation increases the soils productivity and reduces need for farm land. Organic farmers do not use harmful fertilizers. Instead, they take advantage of reusable waste options. These options include human waste and waste from the farm animals. These natural fertilizers do not contain harmful ingredients and it also allows farms to ‘go green’ in a sense that the waste is not going elsewhere. Another environmentally-friendly practice that organic farmers use is tilling. Tilling stirs up the topsoil of farms and makes it so that the soil does not become compact. Compacted soil can result in soil that is unable to create a run-off surface. If this happens, the water will be unable to seep into the soil and irrigate the crop. Tractors passing over soil can cause this compaction to occur, which is why tilling is a more effective way to stir up the soil. And as a bonus, tilling can help get rid of weeds, so it is a win win. Pesticides and preservatives are not only harmful to human beings, but they are also harmful to our environment and ecosystems. Pesticides used in organic farming may run-off and contaminate nearby bodies of water. If enough contaminated run-off from pesticides and artificial fertilizers get into water, it is able to poison animals and fish that live there. According to Raloff, recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to hormones has a substantial effect on the gender and reproductive capacity of fish, throwing off the natural cycle, (1). This is not only harmful to the animals that live there, but if enough fish are dying because of poisoned run-off, the fish industry could suffer and it will affect humans as well. The same chemicals that poison bodies of water could seep into our groundwater and affect the well water we drink and use daily. This does not happen with organic farming, because no chemicals are ever sprayed on the fields and there is much more run off because of tilling practices. Organic farming does not only include crops. There is also organic eggs and meat produced by livestock raised on organic farms. During normal farming of animals, conventional farmers use medications, hormone shots, and antibiotics to promote the health and growth of the animals on their farm. On these conventional farms, animals are forced to be crowded together in dirty, indoor spaces. The living conditions make it necessary for these animals to receive regular medication to fight of diseases that may be caused by their poor living conditions. Because so many animals are crowded together, their manure accumulates rapidly and for convenience for the farmer, is sometimes poured into lagoons which can leak into local water sources and may contaminate our water. Scientists are studying the question that if humans eat hormones found in the meat of animals injected with hormones, if it can affect our human hormones the same way it affects the animal it was injected into. â€Å"Scientists believe about two-thirds of American cattle raised in for slaughter today are injected with hormones to make them grow faster and America’s dairy cows are given a genetically-engineered hormone .. . to increase milk production,† (Raloff, 1). These injected hormones are also a scare because if the animal is digesting them, it means that these chemicals are also in their manure, which is spread on the fields of crops we eat and may be dangerous. Not only could it affect the crop, but also the topsoil, and in turn the groundwater. And again, if it gets into a water source, it has the opportunity to harm the aquatic life living there. In one case, cattle injected with artificial growth hormones revealed serious health problems. These included deformed calves and an increase of a bacterial infection in the udder. In order to treat the infected cows, it needed antibiotics and eventually became reliant on them. Cattle are often forced to produce so much milk that they cannot keep up the nutrients they are losing in the milk and the amount they are given in their food. This imbalance causes them to become malnourished and it makes it easier for them to get more diseases. This type of mistreatment and malnutrition does not happen on organic farms. Healthy plants and animals are more disease resistant. This fact means that as long as the plants and animals are kept clean and healthy, there is little to no need for use of antibiotics or medications. Organic farmers keep the facilities clean to reduce the amount of diseases caused by poor living conditions. Organic farmers allow livestock to live in outdoor conditions with plenty of grazing room. This extra room can greatly decrease the number of diseases in the livestock because they won’t be crowded together to closely. On a conventional farm, livestock is kept indoors and fed possibly unhealthy grains made to make them grow. This is not the case on organic farms. Livestock is kept on a balanced diet and fed using a rotational grazing process. Rotational grazing means that once the livestock has eaten all the grass and vegetation from one field, the farmer will move them to another to allow the vegetation to grow back. This helps maintain the health of the farmland and also keeps the livestock happy by keeping them in an area with enough food, if the livestock is well fed, there is less of a chance that it will get sick as well. If livestock are kept healthy, there is no reason to give it medications, which may not be healthy for the consumer. Organic foods are never bioengineered. Bioengineered foods are foods that are manipulated through their DNA to have traits that are desired. For example, many foods are bioengineered to be resistant to insects, herbicides, and diseases. These crops may seem like a good idea, but many have wondered if these genetically altered crops could be harmful to humans. Crops resistant to bugs and weeds have caused Mother Nature to fight back with â€Å"superbugs† and â€Å"superweeds†, bugs and weeds that have evolved to overcome genetically altered plants. Cases like this cause scientists to turn it up a notch and create a new crop that can defeat the â€Å"supers†. But when is enough enough? Soon the weeds and bugs could become resistant to every type of herbicide resistant plant. There are many health scares associated with bioengineered foods. One is that if a gene is injected into a crop to make it have a more desirable trait, this gene may cause an unexpected danger to the consumer. One such danger is allergic reactions. For example . . . â€Å"bean plants that were genetically modified to increase cysteine and methionine content were discarded after the discovery that the expressed protein of the transgene was highly allergenic† (Villano, 1). Sometimes these dangers can be detected before it is introduced into the public, but sometimes it is not found until several people are affected. Another health risk concerned genetically engineered foods is that for most plants, it is simple to tell that the genetic altering caused an unusual problem in the crop, but in some cases, this is not easily seen. If it is a very obvious problem, the crop may be discarded immediately based on the appearance. However, if the genetic altering caused a problem in low or uneasily seen genes, it may become a problem for the consumer especially if the mutation is in the edible portion of the plant. Again, most of the time these problems would be detected before it is presented to the public, but it may not always be found that soon. This is a very dangerous risk to take. In addition to not being bioengineered, organic food is never exposed to radiation. Food irradiation is frequently used on conventional food because ionizing radiation is can be used to kill bacteria and other germs that may be found in certain foods. These conventionally grown foods are passed through radiation waves on a convention belt. This type of radiation attacks the unwanted organism’s DNA beyond its ability to repair. It can also be used to stop the natural ripening process of fruit in order to prolong the food’s shelf life, and it can be helpful in managing bacteria and other harmful organisms There is much criticism about ionizing radiation. One concern is that irradiation may disguise spoiled food by means of altering the natural growth process of the food. The radiation prolongs its shelf life, but there is reason the food has an expiration date. Some believe that the natural decay of food should not be tampered with. Another scare to some critics is that these chemical changes may not be healthy for the consumer. There are many regulations and inspections in food plants that use irradiation practices, but many critics believe that there is not enough extensive research done of the subject. Critics have several arguments against food irradiation. They argue that food preservation techniques are inefficient because it is unable to undo food spoilage that happened before the radiation treatment. This means that the food is ‘stuck’ in a certain stage of maturity that may not be ideal for the consumer. Another argument is that the radiation process, while getting rid of unwanted organisms, may also remove nutrients that are vital or helpful for the consumer. There are several risks associated with buying conventional foods. These foods may contain pesticides, chemicals, additives, or preservatives that are not natural and may be very harmful for the consumer. When buying organic food, there is never a risk of ingesting any of these harmful substances. Organic farmers use only natural methods of keeping insects, diseases, and weeds away to unsure safety for the consumer. Unlike conventional farms, organic farms are more diverse, more conservative, and use reusable and environmentally friendly practices to keep the earth in good physical shape for years to come. Instead of being concerned with convenience, organic foods focus on health. There are never artificially introduced hormones, sewage sludge, bioengineering, or ionizing radiation exposed to organically grown foods. The most disturbing fact about conventionally grown foods that is that little has been tested in the procedures used to grow the food conveniently. It is not proven that food exposed to radiation, bioengineering, pesticides, herbicides, medications, hormones and antibiotics given to livestock are harmless to humans. Many critics believe that these practices could cause extreme damage to humans in the future if it is not tested more thoroughly. So why not play it safe? Organic foods have none of these health risks and actually have higher levels of minerals, Vitamin C, and antioxidants.